Warning: Use of undefined constant ataa_version_key - assumed 'ataa_version_key' (this will throw an Error in a future version of PHP) in /home/maryde6/public_html/wp-content/plugins/about-the-author-advanced/about-the-author-advanced.php on line 54
Warning: session_start(): Cannot start session when headers already sent in /home/maryde6/public_html/wp-content/plugins/wordpress-simple-paypal-shopping-cart/wp_shopping_cart.php on line 12
Warning: count(): Parameter must be an array or an object that implements Countable in /home/maryde6/public_html/wp-includes/post-template.php on line 240
I have faith in the eggheads, they would create safety measures and those three laws of robotics (or A.I for that matter) that would keep them in check. But then again, there is some attraction in A.I gone wild scenario
The 3 laws is barely a safeguard at all. The laws require they be programmed into the robot but if someone wants to use the robot for illicit purposes they may remove one or all laws.
Or if the programming were to somehow be corrupted the laws may be inaccessible. The laws are just as effective as a safety blanket.
It’s a safeguard like any safeguard, it can fail. Everything can be corrupted and there is a place to make mistakes everywhere. This is a bumpy road and to think that there will be no problems is a stupid assuption. All we can do is “minimize fallout” of anything bad that’ll happen. If we think our smallest mistake will bring destruction of the human race and there will be no room to learn from it, then we probably are too cowardly to even start doing anything.
I highly recommand reading another webcomic about the 3 laws. It’s called Freefall: http://freefall.purrsia.com/
A more recent comic tells it, http://freefall.purrsia.com/ff2600/fc02595.htm
I’d rather the safeguards be more suggestive than forced, the robots will be much more lethal if the 3 laws are enforced to a point where they cannot think.
Set AIs to be morally or at least ethically following the laws and orders, but not blindly doing so would be preferrable.
Nah
That sounds like the secret desire of a few that see themselves as chosen ones willing to forsake all mankind.
No wonder Death wouldn’t be happy with the outcome.
Don’t tell me human race plans to live forever
I have faith in the eggheads, they would create safety measures and those three laws of robotics (or A.I for that matter) that would keep them in check. But then again, there is some attraction in A.I gone wild scenario
The 3 laws is barely a safeguard at all. The laws require they be programmed into the robot but if someone wants to use the robot for illicit purposes they may remove one or all laws.
Or if the programming were to somehow be corrupted the laws may be inaccessible. The laws are just as effective as a safety blanket.
It’s a safeguard like any safeguard, it can fail. Everything can be corrupted and there is a place to make mistakes everywhere. This is a bumpy road and to think that there will be no problems is a stupid assuption. All we can do is “minimize fallout” of anything bad that’ll happen. If we think our smallest mistake will bring destruction of the human race and there will be no room to learn from it, then we probably are too cowardly to even start doing anything.
I highly recommand reading another webcomic about the 3 laws. It’s called Freefall: http://freefall.purrsia.com/
A more recent comic tells it, http://freefall.purrsia.com/ff2600/fc02595.htm
I’d rather the safeguards be more suggestive than forced, the robots will be much more lethal if the 3 laws are enforced to a point where they cannot think.
Set AIs to be morally or at least ethically following the laws and orders, but not blindly doing so would be preferrable.
there was probably a deep conversation going on but i completely forgot it because meep has a dollop of snow as a hat
I say go for it and my reasoning is simple. Our deaths are a given. But given the option, death by robot rampage is one of the cooler ways to go